Team:CIDEB-UANL Mexico/project aroma

From 2014hs.igem.org

Revision as of 03:05, 11 June 2014 by DiegoValadez (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

iGEM CIDEB 2014 - Project

Aroma Module

Since the beginning of iGEM project, the use of fluorescent reporters has been used in each one of the proposed projects in previous years, trying to test the theoretical presence of other proteins in E. coli. For our iGEM 2014 project, this module proposed to promote the usage of aroma reporters, instead of fluorescent ones.

How is the Aroma module composed?

This gene is composed by the following parts (see figure 1A): (1) a constitutive promoter, (2) a RNA thermometer, also called ribo-switch; used to regulate the WinterGreen-odor protein production through temperature, (3) a Wintergreen-odor enzyme generator, used to allow the production of methyl salicylate, induced by salicylic acid, and (4) a terminator. All of these parts are ligated by an 8-bp scar (TACTAGAG.

IMG_0317

Figure 1A Aroma Module

Different to fluorescent reporters, this module was made in order to perform as an aroma reporter and also to test the correct function of the bacteria, for its future usage as a new reporter and functional part (CDS). It is desired to use this part in the project to replace the red fluorescent protein (RFP) in the Capture module. But it was preferable to test it apart to demonstrate its effectiveness. Similarly, this piece is also helpful for Union module, because when performing the filtration by silica, WinterGreen can demonstrate the presence of bacteria in the beads. The team added the RNA thermometer for regulating the production of the aroma in the project.

How does it work?

IMG_0317

Figure 1B Production of Wintergreen Odor

Besides, this module has a constitutive promoter which will be regulated by temperature with the use of the RNA thermometer. When adding salicylic acid to the bacteria in a 32° Celsius environment, the production of the WinterGreen protein will begin.

The first game, the main one, was used to give a fun and easy explanation of the warning signs in the laboratory by inviting people to identify the signs and their corresponding meaning.

The other one was about the project. It was used to explain the different modules and its objectives to the members of our school.

The “2 in 1” memory game was also used in Human Practices’ activities, to obtain a maximum advantage out of it. Some activities were planned with both of this games, mainly competitions within 2 people trying to beat the time record other participant accomplished.

Design:

The images used in both of the games were the following:


(1)   Laboratory warning:

IMG_0317


(2)   Project related:

IMG_0317

Pictures:

Results:

The shape of the game and its size contributed to its attractiveness for the students and people in general. They would came closer to it just for curiosity and when the team mentioned them its purpose and explained the rules to them, they would become interested in participating actively, as well as asking questions about the signs and the project. This incremented their knowledge about both aspects included in the memory game.

All of the students had fun and learned something new about safety and the team after playing this game.

iGEM CIDEB 2014 - Footer