Team:CIDEB-UANL Mexico/math capture
From 2014hs.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Oda.ibarra (Talk | contribs) |
Oda.ibarra (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 361: | Line 361: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<p>It was assumed that <b><i>“f<sub>y</sub>”</i></b>, is the regulatory function that can activate or inhibit the system of given gene; it was assumed 0.6 of the percentage given by Shuang Li’s team. Uv rays activate the promoter, but it is not as efficient as constitutive promoters in the transcription process.</p> | <p>It was assumed that <b><i>“f<sub>y</sub>”</i></b>, is the regulatory function that can activate or inhibit the system of given gene; it was assumed 0.6 of the percentage given by Shuang Li’s team. Uv rays activate the promoter, but it is not as efficient as constitutive promoters in the transcription process.</p> | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
Revision as of 21:15, 20 June 2014
Capture Module
The capture module is based in the use of NhaS, but as NhaS was not the only gene expressed in the circuit. Also RFP was used as a reporter. It was needed to consider this as a factor. The circuit is shown below:
As it is shown in the circuit, the transcription rate is affected by Uv light. Uv promoters, according to Shuang Li’s team (2006), have less efficiency than constitutive promoters, which is approximately 60% of constitutive promoters.
\begin{equation} \large \frac{d\left [ mRNA \right ]}{dt}=\alpha_{1}\cdot f_{y}-d1\left [ mRNA \right ] \end{equation}
\begin{equation} \large f_{y}=0.6 \end{equation}
It was assumed that “fy”, is the regulatory function that can activate or inhibit the system of given gene; it was assumed 0.6 of the percentage given by Shuang Li’s team. Uv rays activate the promoter, but it is not as efficient as constitutive promoters in the transcription process.