Team:CIDEB-UANL Mexico/labwork discussions
From 2014hs.igem.org
DiegoValadez (Talk | contribs) |
DiegoValadez (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 339: | Line 339: | ||
<p>The ligation transformed in <i>E. coli</i> of the NhaS module produced red and white colonies when we expected only red colonies (bacteria expressing the RFP). We did not know the reason of the unexpected result so we designed an experiment with the UV light promoter. </p><p> | <p>The ligation transformed in <i>E. coli</i> of the NhaS module produced red and white colonies when we expected only red colonies (bacteria expressing the RFP). We did not know the reason of the unexpected result so we designed an experiment with the UV light promoter. </p><p> | ||
- | The NhaS module was proved in the experiment with the Petri Dishes in the UV camera. The red bacteria was already red (meaning that the RFP expression already started) before being exposed to the UV camera at 302nm. The promoter <a href = http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_I765001> pUV 1765001</a> is activated by the UV exposition under 360 nm as the iGEM team Colombia_Israel 2007 reported. (iGEM Colombia_Isreal, 2006) | + | The NhaS module was proved in the experiment with the Petri Dishes in the UV camera. The red bacteria was already red (meaning that the RFP expression already started) before being exposed to the UV camera at 302nm. The promoter <a href = http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_I765001> pUV 1765001</a> is activated by the UV exposition under 360 nm as the iGEM team Colombia_Israel 2007 reported. (iGEM Colombia_Isreal, 2006) The UV promoter does not have a reported wavelength interval. |
- | + | The unexpected result obtained can mean that the promoter is so sensible to the UV light that the normal UV radiation is enough to activate it without the need of being exposed to the UV camera. In the normal light the UV rays are present in different ammount as it is presented in the | |
+ | |||
+ | In the part description is reported that the UV promoter gets active and the protein must be expressed after 10 minutes of exposure in the UV camera, but after 2 hours there was no change in the white colonies so the RFP was not expressed there. </p> | ||
+ | |||
<p> | <p> | ||
After doing the experiment we obtained that the red colonies continued with the RFP expression and the white colonies did not changed in color. As we expected to activate the RFP expression in the white colonies, this means that the time of the exposure was not enough to activate the UV promoter or the promoter did not worked in the conditions we thought it would work. To see if the promoter was already activated we did another experiment. </p><p> | After doing the experiment we obtained that the red colonies continued with the RFP expression and the white colonies did not changed in color. As we expected to activate the RFP expression in the white colonies, this means that the time of the exposure was not enough to activate the UV promoter or the promoter did not worked in the conditions we thought it would work. To see if the promoter was already activated we did another experiment. </p><p> |
Revision as of 16:21, 17 June 2014
Results Interpretation
Here is the interpretation of the results that were obtained on all the experiments
Capture module - [Go to Results]
Ligation of NhaS and pSB1C3
The ligation transformed in E. coli of the NhaS module produced red and white colonies when we expected only red colonies (bacteria expressing the RFP). We did not know the reason of the unexpected result so we designed an experiment with the UV light promoter.
The NhaS module was proved in the experiment with the Petri Dishes in the UV camera. The red bacteria was already red (meaning that the RFP expression already started) before being exposed to the UV camera at 302nm. The promoter pUV 1765001 is activated by the UV exposition under 360 nm as the iGEM team Colombia_Israel 2007 reported. (iGEM Colombia_Isreal, 2006) The UV promoter does not have a reported wavelength interval. The unexpected result obtained can mean that the promoter is so sensible to the UV light that the normal UV radiation is enough to activate it without the need of being exposed to the UV camera. In the normal light the UV rays are present in different ammount as it is presented in the In the part description is reported that the UV promoter gets active and the protein must be expressed after 10 minutes of exposure in the UV camera, but after 2 hours there was no change in the white colonies so the RFP was not expressed there.
After doing the experiment we obtained that the red colonies continued with the RFP expression and the white colonies did not changed in color. As we expected to activate the RFP expression in the white colonies, this means that the time of the exposure was not enough to activate the UV promoter or the promoter did not worked in the conditions we thought it would work. To see if the promoter was already activated we did another experiment.
The experiment with NaCl in different concentrations in Petri Dishes showed that the bacteria grew in a medium with high NaCl concentration. The control group with non-modified bacteria did not grow because it did not contain the Nhas insert so it was not able to survive in a saline medium. The white bacteria did actually grow but they did not expressed the RFP, but the fact that they did grow means that they have the NaCl resistance and the insert is inside them.
As the white and red colonies are supposed to come from the same ligation and to contain the same genetic information we need to prove that the insert was inside them. In order to prove this we sent samples of DNA to be sequenced to the DNA Synthesis and Sequentiation Biotechnology Institute Unit (USSDNA in Spanish), from the UNAM.
The primer used was in the complementary reverse chain, so the sequences are in the 3’ to 5’ direction. We did an analysis of the sequences obtained by aligning them with the BLAST Software.
The RFP sequence used in the alignment was the following (in 5' to 3' direction):
Atggcttcctccgaagacgttatcaaagagttcatgcgtttcaaagttcgtatggaaggttccgttaa cggtcacgagttcgaaatcgaaggtgaaggtgaaggtcgtccgtacgaaggtacccagaccgctaaac tgaaagttaccaaaggtggtccgctgccgttcgcttgggacatcctgtccccgcagttccagtacggt tccaaagcttacgttaaacacccggctgacatcccggactacctgaaactgtccttcccggaaggttt caaatgggaacgtgttatgaacttcgaagacggtggtgttgttaccgttacccaggactcctccctgc aagacggtgagttcatctacaaagttaaactgcgtggtaccaacttcccgtccgacggtccggttatg cagaaaaaaaccatgggttgggaagcttccaccgaacgtatgtacccggaagacggtgctctgaaagg tgaaatcaaaatgcgtctgaaactgaaagacggtggtcactacgacgctgaagttaaaaccacctaca tggctaaaaaaccggttcagctgccgggtgcttacaaaaccgacatcaaactggacatcacctcccac aacgaagactacaccatcgttgaacagtacgaacgtgctgaaggtcgtcactccaccggtgcttaata acgctgatagtgctagtgtagatcgctaa
It was aligned with the sequences obtained from the samples Nhas white bacteria and Nhas red bacteria.
NhaS sequence from white colonies (in 3' to 5' direction of the complementary reverse)
TAAATAAAAAGTTTTTTCTAATGCGTTTCTTCTCCTACAACCGAAAACACCGGGTCAGTGAGCGAGGA ACCTGCATAACGCGAAGCACGCTTTTCCGCAAGAAGAAAAAGGGCAGGGTGGTGACACCTTGCCCTTT TTTGCCGGACTGCAGCGGCCGCTACTAGTATTAGCGATCTACACTAGCACTATCAGCGTTATTAAGCA CCGGTGGAGTGACTACCTTCAGCACGTTCGTACTGTTCAACGATGGTGTAGTCTTCGTTGTGGGAGGT GATGTCCAGTTTGATGTCGGTTTTGTAAGCACCCGGCAGCTGAACCGGTTTTTTAGCCATGTAGGTGG TTTTAACTTCAGCGTCGTAGTGACCACCGTCTTTCAGTTTCAGACGCATTTTGATTTCACCTTTCAGA GCACCGTCTTCCGGGTACATACGTTCGGTGGAAGCTTCCCAACCCATGGTTTTTTTCTGCATAACCGG ACCGTCGGACGGGAAGTTGGTACCACGCAGTTTAACTTTGTAGATGAACTCACCGTCTTGCAGGGAGG AGTCCTGGGTAACGGTAACAACACCACCGTCTTCGAAGTTCATAACACGTTCCCATTTGAAACCTTCC GGGAAGGACAGTTTCAGGTAGTCCGGGATGTCAGCCGGGTGTTTAACGTAAGCTTTGGAACCGTACTG GAACTGCGGGGACAGGATGTCCCAAGCGAACGGCAGCGGACCACCTTTGGTAACTTTCAGTTTAGCGG TCTGGGTACCTTCGTACGGACGACCTTCACCTTCACCTTCGATTTTCGAACTCGTGACCGTTAACGGA ACCTTTCCATACATGACCATGTTCTCTCGTCTGATTAGCATCGTGAGCCTGATTCTGTCCTTCTACTT CGCTTACAAATACCGTTATCGTGTGATTAACGCGGTGCTGGGCCGTCGCTGGCTGCGTAAAGTTATTA TCGGTTTTGCCATGCAGATTCCGATGATTCGTGACCGTATGCTGGGTAGCGTTCTGCAAAGTAACCGT CCGCAAAATGTGTAA
NhaS sequence from red colonies (in 3' to 5' direction of the complementary reverse)
AAAGTGTCCACCCCGTACGACCGAGCGGAGCGAGTCAGTGAGCGAGGAAGCCTGCATAACGCGAAGTA ATCTTTTCGGCTTAAAGAAAAAGGGCAGGGTGGTGACACCTTGCCCTTTTTTGCCGGACTGCAGCGGC CGCTACTAGTATATAAACGCAGAAAGGCCCACCCGAAGGTGAGCCAGTGTGACTCTAGTAGAGAGCGT TCACCGACAAACAACAGATAAAACGAAAGGCCCAGTCTTTCGACTGAGCCTTTCGTTTTATTTGATGC CTGGCTCTAGTAGCGATCTACACTAGCACTATCAGCGTTATTAAGCACCGGTGGAGTGACGACCTTCA GCACGTTCGTACTGTTCAACGATGGTGTAGTCTTCGTTGTGGGAGGTGATGTCCAGTTTGATGTCGGT TTTGTAAGCACCCGGCAGCTGAACCGGTTTTTTAGCCATGTAGGTGGTTTTAACTTCAGCGTCGTAGT GACCACCGTCTTTCAGTTTCAGACGCATTTTGATTTCACCTTTCAGAGCACCGTCTTCCGGGTACATA CGTTCGGTGGAAGCTTCCCAACCCATGGTTTTTTTCTGCATAACCGGACCGTCGGACGGGAAGTTGGT ACCACGCAGTTTAACTTTGTAGATGAACTCACCGTCTTGCAGGGAGGAGTCCTGGGTAACGGTAACAA CACCACCGTCTTCGAAGTTCATAACACGTTCCCATTTGAAACCTTCCGGGAAGGACAGTTTCAGGTAG TCCGGGATGTCAGCCGGGTGTTTTAACGTAAGCTTTGGAACCGTACTGGAACTGCGGGGAACAGGATG TCCCAAGCGAACGGCAGCGGACCACCTTTGGTAACTTTCAGTTTAGCGGTCTCGGGTACCTTCGAACG GACGACCTTCACCTTCACCCTTCAATTTTCAAACTCGTGACCGTAAACGGAACCTTTCCATACAACTT TGAAAACGCATGAAACTCATTTGAATAACGTCTTCCGGAAGAAAGCCCAATCTAAGTATTTTCTCCCT CTTTTCTCATATAAATGTGATGAATATTTGATCTATCCGCCCTCCAACAACTTTCCCACAACAATCAT GTATCGAAATTCCTGTTATACGACACTATAAAGATGGTATAAAAAGCCCGTGGAGGGGGCGTGACCAReport
The report obtained from the analysis with the NhaS in red colonies is the following:
The report obtained from the analysis with the NhaS in white colonies is the following:
We also made an analysis with the Ribosome Binding Site (RBS) sequence:
With these results we can infer that the BioBrick works find and expresses the NhaS (because both of them survive in a high NaCl concentrated medium) but it stops being translated in the RBS or in the RFP region causing the colonies to be white instead of red but being able to survive in a medium with high NaCl concentration.
The question is if the problem is caused by a mutation, When did it happen?
The ligation transformed contained a DNA obtained from a digestion done the May 16th in the 3rd week registered in the Notebook. This digestion was exposed to the UV light camera at 302nm for about 5 minutes. After the digestion it was ligated and purified. Later it was transformed in E. coli. The chance of occurring a mutation of this insert was 1) before the miniPrep, inside the cell or 2) due to the UV radiation after the transformation. The UV radiation at 312nm can cause a damage in the DNA sample and to reduce the succes in transormation in E. coli (Gründemann, 1996). There are also several types of mutagenesis due to the UV radiation inside the cell (Ikehata & Ono, 2011) that can have occurred before the transformation to some samples of the plasmid. The red bacteria had the original DNA and the white bacteria had the mutated DNA.
Aroma module - [Go to Results]
Qualitative experiment
People had different opinions while smelling the different Petri dishes with the aroma transformed bacteria. All of them used different words but at the end most of them remitted to the same meaning. The MIT team documented that the odor was produced when it was added 2mM of salicylic acid, so it was expected that the Petri dishes did not smell so much, but the results indicated that there was a mayor odor at 10mM than at 2mM (experiment previously done).
In the samples of 20 mM, both of the bacteria that was grown under 32 ºC had a little smell, which in theory, should not had happened because the riboswitch should be a loop at that temperature. One posible explanation is that the riboswitch is very sensitive to heat, and it could be activated during the time in which the Petri dishes were outside the incubator to perform the experiment and with the heat of the hands of the people who smelled it.
Finally, all of the samples that had a concentration of 30 mM of salicylic acid smelled like rotten food. By this, it can be inferred that all the bacteria in the Petri Dishes could not withstand the condition that particular concentration of salicylic acid, therefore they died, because “growth in a subinhibitory concentration of salicylic acid resulted in a significant reduction in the number of bacterial cells and a reduction in the rate of the number of bacteria increasing during logarithmic growth” (Bandara MB, et. al. 2006)
Bibliography
● Gründemann, D., & Schömig, E. (1996) Protection of DNA during preparative agarose gel electrophoresis against damage induced by ultraviolet light. Biotechniques, 21, 898-903.
● Ikehata, H., & Ono, T. (2011) The Mechanisms of UV Mutagenesis. Journal of Radiation Research, 52, 115-125.
● iGEM Colombian Team 2007 (2007, October 26). Part:BBa I765001. Retrieved June 15, 2014, from http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_I765001
● iGEM Colombian Team 2006 (2006). A Microbial Biosensor Device for Iron Detection under UV irradiation. Retrieved June 15, 2014, from https://2007.igem.org/wiki/index.php/IGEM_2006_Project
● Bandara MB, et al. (2006, October). Salicylic acid reduces the product... [Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006] - PubMed - NCBI. Retrieved June 13, 2014, from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17003439