Team:CIDEB-UANL Mexico/safety riskanalysis

From 2014hs.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 461: Line 461:
The method proposed is simple, increasing the intensity of the UV light already used in the Project to turn off the organism. <br>
The method proposed is simple, increasing the intensity of the UV light already used in the Project to turn off the organism. <br>
-
<img width="281" height="93" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014hs/7/7e/Light-spectrumCIDEB.jpg" align="left" hspace="12" alt="(TEA).jpg"></p>
+
<center><img width="281" height="93" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014hs/7/7e/Light-spectrumCIDEB.jpg" hspace="12" alt="(TEA).jpg"></p>
-
<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
-
<p>Fig.10: Different types of UV rays (. https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014hs/7/7e/Light-spectrumCIDEB.jpg )</p>
+
<p>Fig.10: Different types of UV rays.</p></center>
</br>
</br>
<p>First of all, Ultraviolet or UV light is light with wavelengths from 100 to 400 nm. According to Meulemans in 1986, its spectrum is divided into 4 different categories, as the following table shows:<br>
<p>First of all, Ultraviolet or UV light is light with wavelengths from 100 to 400 nm. According to Meulemans in 1986, its spectrum is divided into 4 different categories, as the following table shows:<br>

Revision as of 06:59, 14 June 2014

Safety Questions Posters Lab Safety Cards Memory Game Risk Analysis
iGEM CIDEB 2014 - Project

Risk Analysis

Some parts of this text were edited. You can see and download the oficial PDF version of this document >>>>>>> RIGHT HERE<<<<<<<<
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Overview

IGEM CIDEB 2014 considers biosafety as important as every other points of the iGEM competition. Because of this reason, the team decided to perform a Safety Risk Assessment focused on the project and in the lab practices needed to accomplish it.
In this assessment, a description of our host organism is made, along with the genetic modifications that were applied to it, including preventive measures to avoid its dissemination and appropriate identification and containment measures, in the case it was released into the environment. Also the overall potential risks of the project were included, taking in consideration all of the possible risks of working in our laboratory, along with preventive measures to reduce risk to a minimum.

 

Organism’s Description

Escherichia coli (E. coli) is a large and diverse genus of bacteria belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae. Although most strains of E. coli are relatively harmless, some can potentially affect humans and animals. Pathogenic kinds of E. coli can cause diarrhea, along with urinary tract infections, respiratory illness and pneumonia, among other symptoms. E. coli can be commonly found in the digestive tract of humans and many animals. It plays an important role in the decomposition and absorption of certain nutrients in the intestine that the body cannot break down by itself and to also prevent the digestive track to be colonized by other harmful bacteria. E. coli are capable of both aerobic and anaerobic cellular respiration, which is a characteristic that allows them to live in both oxygen rich and oxygen poor environments, which has allowed them to thrive in a wide variety of ecosystems. As a prokaryote, E. coli bacterium has no organelles, and its genetic information is not enclosed in a nucleus. E. coli protective layer consists on a cell wall and a capsule that protects it from the outside, potentially harmful environment. E. coli goes through binary fusion on a regular basis if given the right conditions, usually at 37° Celsius, and it is able to thrive and reproduce at a very fast rate. As previously mentioned, E. coli is one of the most diverse genera of bacteria, probably due to its adaptive abilities. Although there is a wide variety of different E. coli strains to choose from, not all of them have the same characteristics; some of them are pathogenic and are not safe to work with, which is the main reason why during the practices at the team’s laboratory, the E. coli’s strain that was used is the K12 DH5-α strain, which is one of the safest strains to work with, and one of the most used in biotechnology research. The K12 DH5-α strain is characterized by its poor abilities to colonize plant and animal tissue, and a low resistance to outside-lab environment, temperature fluctuation and different media composition causing the organism to die. E. coli’s K12 DH5-α inability to colonize intestinal tissue was experimented in 1978 in a work made by R. Curtiss “Biological containment and cloning vector transmissibility” showing that the K12 DH5-α strain is not likely to behave as a pathogen in mammal tissue. Due to these previous mentioned characteristics, it is classified as a Class 1 Containment under the European Federation of Biotechnology guidelines, and according to the United States Environmental Control Agency (EPA) E. coli K12 DH5-α strain opposes a very low risk for other organisms and under contained conditions of fermentation and are safe to work with.

IMG_0317

Figure 1: E. coli bacterium and its parts

 

Potential Risks


The project uses E. coli K-12 as the host bacteria, causing it to be resistant to saline water, capture sodium ions, getting attached to silica surfaces and releasing the winter-green aroma as reporter.
Potential Risks with the bacteria are minimum because, as previously mentioned in the organism’s description, the strain used is a non-pathogenic type. E. coli K12 has no known survival mechanism in living tissues, nor any of the health affecting symptoms that some varieties have.
E. coli is absolutely safe, as P Kunhert states: “They are [E. coli K 12] classified as biologically safe vehicles for the propagation of many efficient gene cloning and expression vectors in all major national and international guidelines on biological safety for work with recombinant DNA technology” (1995).
K-12 strain is defective in its cell wall components relevant to the ability to reorganize and adhere to the mucosal surface of colonic cells (Curtiss 1978). It does not have the type of glycocalyx required for attachment to the mucosal surface of the human colon.
Performing genetic modifications in the project was not dangerous because the materials were handled carefully, in accordance with the “Laboratory Category One” guidelines published by the World Health Organization (WHO).
The modified E. coli parts are safe for the environment and for human use. Variables are controlled by the team, as in the case of Capture module (NhaS) which is controlled by a UV promoter.
Similarly, the Aroma module is controlled by a Riboswitch regulated by temperature in order to decide when and how is going to be activated, besides adding salicylic acid, which is only harmful in high doses for humans, and in the project it is used in very small amounts (2mm) to activate it.
The resistance module is also safe, since it gives the bacteria the ability to resist adverse conditions that would normally kill it, like high temperatures, high saline levels and high UV radiation, and nevertheless the bacteria would die in a normal environment.

The Union module gives E. CARU the ability to bind glass and silica surfaces, which we will use in beads form with the presentation that is used commercially. No direct risks are related to the module itself, but Silica gel beads may contain toxic and potentially carcinogenic cobalt (II) chloride, which is added as a moisture indicator in commercially available product. This point is analyzed further in the “Union as a safety measurement” section.

Safety measures in the laboratory


IGEM CIDEB 2014 had to take in consideration some aspects about biosafety when working in the project. At all times an instructor was present as a supervisor during the practices.
The team followed what the WHO’s category 1 laboratory guidelines indicated. The use of lab coat, long jeans, closed shoes and, if needed, tied hair was performed at all times while working on the lab. When managing dangerous substances gloves and/or special glasses were used depending on the situation.
When working with the trans-illuminator, the team took care of not looking directly the UV rays, instead a plastic UV protective shield and glasses were used while working with UV.
The laboratory was kept perfectly clean and dry, especially the place in which the instruments were located nearby electrical outputs. Glassware were reviewed and checked for cracks, before each usage; especially before applying under vacuum or pressure on them. The generated waste was always placed in a properly labeled waste container, placed handily to avoid spills.

Potential Risks


The project uses E. coli K-12 as the host bacteria, causing it to be resistant to saline water, capture sodium ions, getting attached to silica surfaces and releasing the winter-green aroma as reporter.
Potential Risks with the bacteria are minimum because, as previously mentioned in the organism’s description, the strain used is a non-pathogenic type. E. coli K12 has no known survival mechanism in living tissues, nor any of the health affecting symptoms that some varieties have.
E. coli is absolutely safe, as P Kunhert states: “They are [E. coli K 12] classified as biologically safe vehicles for the propagation of many efficient gene cloning and expression vectors in all major national and international guidelines on biological safety for work with recombinant DNA technology” (1995).
K-12 strain is defective in its cell wall components relevant to the ability to reorganize and adhere to the mucosal surface of colonic cells (Curtiss 1978). It does not have the type of glycocalyx required for attachment to the mucosal surface of the human colon.
Performing genetic modifications in the project was not dangerous because the materials were handled carefully, in accordance with the “Laboratory Category One” guidelines published by the World Health Organization (WHO).
The modified E. coli parts are safe for the environment and for human use. Variables are controlled by the team, as in the case of Capture module (NhaS) which is controlled by a UV promoter.
Similarly, the Aroma module is controlled by a Riboswitch regulated by temperature in order to decide when and how is going to be activated, besides adding salicylic acid, which is only harmful in high doses for humans, and in the project it is used in very small amounts (2mm) to activate it.
The resistance module is also safe, since it gives the bacteria the ability to resist adverse conditions that would normally kill it, like high temperatures, high saline levels and high UV radiation, and nevertheless the bacteria would die in a normal environment.

The Union module gives E. CARU the ability to bind glass and silica surfaces, which we will use in beads form with the presentation that is used commercially. No direct risks are related to the module itself, but Silica gel beads may contain toxic and potentially carcinogenic cobalt (II) chloride, which is added as a moisture indicator in commercially available product. This point is analyzed further in the “Union as a safety measurement” section.

Safety measures in the laboratory


IGEM CIDEB 2014 had to take in consideration some aspects about biosafety when working in the project. At all times an instructor was present as a supervisor during the practices.
The team followed what the WHO’s category 1 laboratory guidelines indicated. The use of lab coat, long jeans, closed shoes and, if needed, tied hair was performed at all times while working on the lab. When managing dangerous substances gloves and/or special glasses were used depending on the situation.
When working with the trans-illuminator, the team took care of not looking directly the UV rays, instead a plastic UV protective shield and glasses were used while working with UV.
The laboratory was kept perfectly clean and dry, especially the place in which the instruments were located nearby electrical outputs. Glassware were reviewed and checked for cracks, before each usage; especially before applying under vacuum or pressure on them. The generated waste was always placed in a properly labeled waste container, placed handily to avoid spills.

Hazardous substances
While working in the E.CARU project, specifically in the laboratory, the team was exposed to different substances that, if managed incorrectly, could cause harmful effects.
The main substances used in the project were the following (click for further information):

● Ethidium bromide
● NaOH
● Acetic acid
● Methyl salicylate
● UV radiation
● Tris HCl
● EDTA (Ethylenediamineetetraacetic acid)
● DSS (Dodecyl-sodium sulfate)
● Potassium acetate
● Agarose
● Calcium Chloride (CaCl)
● Ethanol (Ethyl Alcohol)
● “Lysogenic Broth” (LB) broth and agar
● Buffers
● RNase
● Restriction enzymes
● Saline water
● Milli-Q water

Union as a safety measurement


The Union module in the project has a genetic device that gives the bacteria the ability to anchor itself to silica surfaces. The team used this ability to use the bacteria as a biological filter. This biological filter would clean the water free of Escherichia coli to meet a solution for salty water.
Why silica pearls? Because silica pearls are very common to find, and even though that they are known for being harmful for humans if ingested, it’s not the silica gel that is toxic, what is toxic are the substances that the silica pearl can absorb (silica gel is known for its characteristic of having a great ability for absorbing humidity). Silica is, for example, used as a safe food additive, this means no permit is needed when added.
If people are not comfortable with using silica gel pearls for the biological filter, glass pearls can also be used, as the genetic device permits anchorage to glass surfaces, and glass has the advantage of not releasing any kind of substance if introduced in water, even for long periods of time, for the bacterium to attach. Also, for more efficiency in the de-contamination, glass recipients could be used, that way it would be easier for the anchorage of the bacterium.
The functioning of the biological filter is very simple: due to the reason that after the first three modules of the project, salt water would still have the genetically modified bacteria, which will have sodium ions within its cellular membrane, a filtration process will be carried out by silica pearls, which will result in desalinized water without the before mentioned bacteria.
For the filtration process to happen, no modification was used besides the genetic information that gives Escherichia coli the ability to adhere to the silica gel or to glass surfaces. Thus, when bacteria have already captured the desired amount of sodium ions, by adding silica or glass beads, the bacteria will attach in these and this will help remove the GMO (Genetically Modified Organism) in the water by an easy filtration of the water to be free of silica or glass beads containing the bacteria.
The risks considered in the use of silica beads are minimal since "The silica gel is inert and considered a non-toxic product," according to CITUC (UC Toxicological Information Centre for its acronym in Spanish). Actually, if the pearls are not correctly removed, there is only one risk: choking hazard, which is prevented by the safety guidelines that are followed in the laboratory and warns that under no circumstance water should be ingested with or without the silica beads before being tested and approved.
The biological filter, besides being the main purpose of our project, is one of the team’s safety measurements, because it prevents the bacterium from contaminating and reproducing in water by being removed.

Method for shutting down E.CARU
When treating with GMOs there’s no such thing as “overprotection”. iGEM CIDEB 2014 takes safety seriously and decided that the project should include at least one method to shut off E. coli in case of an unexpected emergency situation, at least in a theoretical way.
The method proposed is simple, increasing the intensity of the UV light already used in the Project to turn off the organism.

(TEA).jpg

Fig.10: Different types of UV rays.


First of all, Ultraviolet or UV light is light with wavelengths from 100 to 400 nm. According to Meulemans in 1986, its spectrum is divided into 4 different categories, as the following table shows:


Type of UV

Wavelength

Vacuum UV

100 to 200 nm

UV-C

200 to 280 nm

UV-B

280 to 315 nm

UV-A

315 to 400 nm

EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) states that disinfection by UV primarily occurs due to the germicidal action of UV-B and UV-C light on microorganisms. And that the germicidal action of UV-A light is small relative to UV-B and UV-C light. So, in order for UV-A light to cause a &ldquo;shut off&rdquo; effect in the organism, very long exposure times are necessary.
What UV light does to microorganisms is that, once absorbed, it modifies and damages irreparably the DNA of the organism on the matters of question, in this case E. coli K12, by causing a photochemical damage. Therefore, RNA and DNA, molecules in charge of storing and carrying genetic information, can&rsquo;t function properly, causing it to lose the ability to reproduce.
As Wolfe in 1990 states, and with the information from EPA, 254 nm is the most potent wavelength that can cause damage in DNA. 254 nm belongs to the UV-C light category and the team is planning to use it that way to deactivate E. CARU in extreme situations.
The UV light already used in the project is a promoter of the Capture module. This promoter is activated by 360nm, so it belongs in the UV-A category, and as it was mentioned before, this does not cause damage to the bacteria in short periods of time.
According to our project, UV is one of the easiest methods to shut off our GMO.

Conclusions
After doing an analysis of the possible risk related to our project and the safety measures that should be taken into consideration, it can be concluded that the project itself do not represents a considerable risk for human health, due to the poor resistance of the used strain of bacteria, even with the IrrE resistance module, the bacteria is still too weak to thrive in a non-controlled environment. Even though the bacteria cannot live outside the lab, all of the safety related issues to bio-contention of the organisms were all taken into consideration to avoid any possible contamination outside the laboratory. As previously mentioned, the bacteria does not oppose a significant threat for safety, but some substances used in the lab can be a major health concern if not managed properly. Because of this, the laboratory rules were made according to the WHO level 1 laboratory guidelines, and supervision was always present to avoid threats for the team.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

References
iGEM CIDEB 2014 - Footer

Retrieved from "http://2014hs.igem.org/Team:CIDEB-UANL_Mexico/safety_riskanalysis"