"
Team:Consort Alberta/project
From 2014hs.igem.org
m |
|||
| Line 187: | Line 187: | ||
<p class="auto-style42" style="height: 19px"> </p> | <p class="auto-style42" style="height: 19px"> </p> | ||
| - | <img alt="" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014hs/ | + | <img alt="" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014hs/d/dc/Photo.GIF" /></p> |
<FONT COLOR=white><p class="auto-style18" style="height: 43px; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt"> | <FONT COLOR=white><p class="auto-style18" style="height: 43px; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt"> | ||
PROTOTYPE #2: In a container, we combine our soil sample and our alginate beads, mix them around, and then sift out the beads. The beads produce our indicator protein from the contamination levels of the soil. This design was inspired by the <a class="nav" <a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/Project/Devices#Milestone2">Peking 2013 Team</a> that used alginate encapsulation beads. Their reasoning and justification for using alginate beads stood out to us, as they stated that it was stable and inexpensive and easy to shape and manipulate. Upon further research into the use of these beads, we discovered that this prototype could be more efficient to use then our first prototype that required a few different pieces to the system. This revised prototype would also be easier for the average oil worker to use compared to the larger prototype. | PROTOTYPE #2: In a container, we combine our soil sample and our alginate beads, mix them around, and then sift out the beads. The beads produce our indicator protein from the contamination levels of the soil. This design was inspired by the <a class="nav" <a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/Project/Devices#Milestone2">Peking 2013 Team</a> that used alginate encapsulation beads. Their reasoning and justification for using alginate beads stood out to us, as they stated that it was stable and inexpensive and easy to shape and manipulate. Upon further research into the use of these beads, we discovered that this prototype could be more efficient to use then our first prototype that required a few different pieces to the system. This revised prototype would also be easier for the average oil worker to use compared to the larger prototype. | ||
Revision as of 02:26, 18 June 2014
Home |
Our Project |
Our Team
| Human Practices |
Our Notebook |
Safety |
Attributions |
Sponsors |
Contact Us
Our Project
Comparison Final Result Prototyping
For this season our team is working on expanding and perfecting our project. Our
goal is to create a biobrick and a working prototype that will detect levels of
xylene, which is linked directly to carcinogens found in petroleum products such
as benzene and its derivatives. Our biobrick will create different amounts of
fluorescent protein in the presence of xylene bound to xylR. The economy in our
rural community is based largely on agriculture and oil and gas industries. Oil
spills have detrimental effects on the environment, economy, and general health.
This year we will be testing out two different indicators to allow
options concerning scale and intensity of colour change. In future years our
project will allow early identification of contamination will facilitate rapid
clean-up and minimize health risks to members of our community and to the
consumers who rely on the food we produce.
PROTOTYPE #1: Our first prototype has a positive pressure creating a current(blue) from the left box and pushing the xylene particles (orange) from the sample in the middle box that holds our E. Coli culture, producing our indicator protein. This was a plausible idea, as it would require fairly non-expensive materials and could be maintained by the average business person. However, we thought it could be more efficient in it's design, and so we kept looking for ideas.
PROTOTYPE #2: In a container, we combine our soil sample and our alginate beads, mix them around, and then sift out the beads. The beads produce our indicator protein from the contamination levels of the soil. This design was inspired by the Peking 2013 Team that used alginate encapsulation beads. Their reasoning and justification for using alginate beads stood out to us, as they stated that it was stable and inexpensive and easy to shape and manipulate. Upon further research into the use of these beads, we discovered that this prototype could be more efficient to use then our first prototype that required a few different pieces to the system. This revised prototype would also be easier for the average oil worker to use compared to the larger prototype.
