Team:CSWProteens/project/discussion

From 2014hs.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(11 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
+
<html>
 +
<style>
 +
#contentSub, #footer-box, #catlinks, #search-controls, #p-logo, .printfooter, .firstHeading,.visualClear {display: none;} /*-- hides default wiki settings --*/
 +
</style><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<head>
<meta content="en-ca" http-equiv="Content-Language" />
<meta content="en-ca" http-equiv="Content-Language" />
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type" />
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type" />
-
 
+
<script src="http://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.9.1.min.js"></script>
 +
<script src="https://2014hs.igem.org/Team:CSWProteens/jquery.slides.min?action=raw&amp;ctype=text/javascript"></script>
<style type="text/css">
<style type="text/css">
.auto-style1 {
.auto-style1 {
font-family: Arial;
font-family: Arial;
-
font-size: 20pt;
+
font-size: 12pt;
margin-top: 0px;
margin-top: 0px;
margin-bottom: 0px;
margin-bottom: 0px;
         margin-right: 0px;
         margin-right: 0px;
margin-left: 0px;
margin-left: 0px;
 +
color: #000000
}
}
Line 42: Line 47:
.auto-style6 {
.auto-style6 {
-
        text-align: center;
 
font-family: Arial;
font-family: Arial;
-
font-size: 50pt;
+
font-size: 20pt;
margin-top: 10px;
margin-top: 10px;
margin-bottom: 10px;
margin-bottom: 10px;
-
         color: #058C1D;
+
         color: #000000;
.auto-style7 {
.auto-style7 {
Line 126: Line 130:
<meta content="revealTrans(Duration=3.0,Transition=2)" http-equiv="Site-Enter" />
<meta content="revealTrans(Duration=3.0,Transition=2)" http-equiv="Site-Enter" />
</head>
</head>
-
<center><a href="https://2014hs.igem.org/Team:CSWProteens/project"><img alt="" class="auto-style11" height="200" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014hs/c/cd/Plantifreeze.gif" width="200" /><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014hs/0/02/Cooltext1611158980.png" width="500">
+
<center><a href="https://2014hs.igem.org/Team:CSWProteens/project"><img alt="" class="auto-style11" height="200" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014hs/c/cd/Plantifreeze.gif" width="200" /><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014hs/8/87/Banner.png" width="500">
</a>
</a>
-
<a href="https://2014hs.igem.org/Main_Page"><img alt="" class="auto-style5" height="200" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014hs/3/3e/CSW_iGEM_Logo.png" width="200" /></a> </p></center>
+
<a href="https://2014hs.igem.org/Main_Page"><img alt="" class="auto-style5" height="200" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014hs/2/26/Igem_grpyon.png" width="200" /></a> </p></center>
<body style=" color: #FFFFFF;background-color: #000000;  
<body style=" color: #FFFFFF;background-color: #000000;  
Line 153: Line 157:
<li><a href="https://2014hs.igem.org/Team:CSWProteens/project/results">Results</a></li>
<li><a href="https://2014hs.igem.org/Team:CSWProteens/project/results">Results</a></li>
<li><a href="https://2014hs.igem.org/Team:CSWProteens/project/discussion">Discussion</a></li>
<li><a href="https://2014hs.igem.org/Team:CSWProteens/project/discussion">Discussion</a></li>
-
<li><a href="https://2014hs.igem.org/Team:CSWProteens/project/model">Modeling</a></li>
+
<li><a href="https://2014hs.igem.org/Team:CSWProteens/project/safety">Safety</a></li>
</ul>
</ul>
</li>
</li>
Line 168: Line 172:
<a href="https://2014hs.igem.org/Team:CSWProteens/humanpractices"><b>Outreach</b></a>
<a href="https://2014hs.igem.org/Team:CSWProteens/humanpractices"><b>Outreach</b></a>
<ul>
<ul>
-
<li><a href="https://2014hs.igem.org/Team:CSWProteens/humanpractices">Illuminarium</a></li>
+
</ul>
</ul>
</li>
</li>
Line 178: Line 182:
                                 <li><a href="mailto:hgoldsweig@csw.org?subject=iGEM">Email</a></li>
                                 <li><a href="mailto:hgoldsweig@csw.org?subject=iGEM">Email</a></li>
</ul>
</ul>
-
</ul>
+
</ul><center>
-
<p><center><b>
+
<p class="auto-style4">D I S C U S S I O N<p></center>
-
Safety</center></b>
+
<p class="auto-style1">
 +
The team felt it was useful to mention some reactions to the overall experience of iGEM at CSW. Here they are:
-
<center><b>Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues?</b></center><p>
+
<p><p class="auto-style1">
-
Regarding organisms, our project raises minimal concerns for safety. We use E. Coli bacteria, which has been classified as biosafety level one by the World Health Organization (WHO) Laboratory Biosafety Manual. E. Coli, “is a non-pathogenic strain that cannot permanently colonize the gut of healthy humans or animals” (WHO Laboratory Biosafety Manual). Our team also uses a DNA sequence from the Rhagium Inquisitor beetle, but we received the part directly and had no contact with the beetle.  
+
Arguably the single most crucial factor in determining the success of an iGem project, perhaps even more so than the idea itself, is how well the team works as a group. We have certainly had our ups and downs with that aspect of the iGem process. Communication and participation have turned out to be the keys to progress for us. When we met or were in contact and everyone was on the same page, we got work done. On the other hand, when we had limited communication and especially participation, we got little to no work done. Our idea remained mostly unchanged from the beginning, so the only factor controlling our progress towards our goal was teamwork. This day and night difference showed us how effective good teamwork can be.
-
<p>We have managed to keep our lab safe, and have used reasonable safety precautions. No organisms or materials we handled in our lab were dangerous other than bunsen burners and UV lights, but we nevertheless enacted safety measures. We cleaned all surfaces with 70% ethanol, and sterilized all unsterile materials with an autoclave. We properly disposed of waste in the lab. All team members wore safety gloves and glasses when appropriate. A safety shower-and-eyewash was readily available in the lab, in case of emergency. UV-protection glasses were worn when we used UV lights to detect dye in electrophoresis gels. Heat-gloves were used by team members when handling potentially hot objects. All bunsen burners included safety shutoffs, and team members were instructed how to use these burners safely. Our instructor clearly led us through each lab process and all safety measures necessary before any of said processes were conducted.
+
<p><p class="auto-style1">
-
<p>If our project did not go to plan and the organisms or their byproducts were released, no immediate threat would be posed. As mentioned above, E. Coli is not a harmful organism. Furthermore, it can only live in a lab environment, and would not survive outside. The antifreeze protein that our project will supply also poses no threat. As stated in Yale’s 2011 IGEM team wiki, many antifreeze proteins “are already being used in industry and for consumer products” (https://2011.igem.org/Team:Yale/Safety).  
+
Teamwork and a good project idea are both necessary for success in iGem, but both are useless without guidance from an advisor. The job of the advisor is to guide us through the iGem process from a position of experience while still allowing us to discover and do things for ourselves. One of the most important things we learned about working with our advisor is that although it was his job to guide us, we had to communicate with him to make sure everyone knew what was going on and what was being done. He was overseeing the project’s completion and we had to let him know that we were completing parts of the project, not just expecting him to read our minds.
-
<p><b><center>
+
<p><p class="auto-style1">
-
Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise safety issues?</b></center><p>
+
In addition to our advisor, we benefited greatly from the help of external advisors. These were actual professionals working currently in the field of biology. The expertise, facilities, and recourses that our external advisors brought to the table were invaluable. External advisors were also very helpful in troubleshooting the problems that arose during the process due to their high level of expertise.<br>
-
None of the devices we made raise any safety issues. As stated above, the antifreeze protein that our device expresses is unharmful and completely safe.  
+
The iGem competition is a very effective teaching tool for several aspects of scientific careers. It taught us about applying for fundraising, about presenting, and about the high level of independence and interdependence in lab work. It was an extremely valuable experience especially for those of us going into lab science as a profession.
-
<p>
+
-
<b><center>Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?</b></center><p>
+
-
Our high school has no official biosafety review board. However, our science department and our instructor have reviewed all lab procedures we used, and they have ensured the continued safety of anyone in contact with the lab. Our lab also complies to all biology lab standards of the United States, as legally required.  
+
-
<p><b><center>
+
-
Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?</b></center><p>
+
-
Many high schools require students to sign a Laboratory Safety Contract. This simple approach to lab safety strengthens student awareness of an appropriate lab safety culture.  
+
-
<p><b><center>
+
-
Are contaminated materials and biohazard waste handled according to current guidelines?</b></center><p>
+
-
Receptacles with biohazard bags are provided for the disposal of contaminated waste. Any material that has been contaminated with bacteria are placed in these buckets. No liquids containing bacteria are ever poured down the sink. <br>
+
-
No cultures or culture material may be taken from the lab.<br>
+
-
Non-Disposable contaminated materials are decontaminated and then are autoclaved and reused. Examples are plastic caps, forceps, and glass screw-cap tubes. Designated containers of disinfectant are provided for these items.
+

Latest revision as of 00:26, 21 June 2014

D I S C U S S I O N

The team felt it was useful to mention some reactions to the overall experience of iGEM at CSW. Here they are:

Arguably the single most crucial factor in determining the success of an iGem project, perhaps even more so than the idea itself, is how well the team works as a group. We have certainly had our ups and downs with that aspect of the iGem process. Communication and participation have turned out to be the keys to progress for us. When we met or were in contact and everyone was on the same page, we got work done. On the other hand, when we had limited communication and especially participation, we got little to no work done. Our idea remained mostly unchanged from the beginning, so the only factor controlling our progress towards our goal was teamwork. This day and night difference showed us how effective good teamwork can be.

Teamwork and a good project idea are both necessary for success in iGem, but both are useless without guidance from an advisor. The job of the advisor is to guide us through the iGem process from a position of experience while still allowing us to discover and do things for ourselves. One of the most important things we learned about working with our advisor is that although it was his job to guide us, we had to communicate with him to make sure everyone knew what was going on and what was being done. He was overseeing the project’s completion and we had to let him know that we were completing parts of the project, not just expecting him to read our minds.

In addition to our advisor, we benefited greatly from the help of external advisors. These were actual professionals working currently in the field of biology. The expertise, facilities, and recourses that our external advisors brought to the table were invaluable. External advisors were also very helpful in troubleshooting the problems that arose during the process due to their high level of expertise.
The iGem competition is a very effective teaching tool for several aspects of scientific careers. It taught us about applying for fundraising, about presenting, and about the high level of independence and interdependence in lab work. It was an extremely valuable experience especially for those of us going into lab science as a profession.