Team:Nanjing NFLS/qwe

From 2014hs.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 25: Line 25:
.mb-inav li a{display:block;width:10px;height:79px;background:#bdbdbd}
.mb-inav li a{display:block;width:10px;height:79px;background:#bdbdbd}
.mb-inav li a.cur{background:#671900}
.mb-inav li a.cur{background:#671900}
-
.mb-ibox{width:444px;height:239px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;left:35px; bottom:225px;}
+
.mb-ibox{width:444px;height:239px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;left:35px; bottom:240px;}
.mb-ibox a{display:block;width:444px;height:239px;overflow:hidden;position:absolute;top:0;left:0;z-index:10;display:none}
.mb-ibox a{display:block;width:444px;height:239px;overflow:hidden;position:absolute;top:0;left:0;z-index:10;display:none}
</style>
</style>

Revision as of 11:59, 19 June 2014

索引按钮竖向排放jquery图片切换

Q1:

Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of: researcher safety, public safety, or environmental safety?

Q2&Q3:

Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise safety issues?

Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?

Q4:

Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?

222 222 333